Editorial policy

Emerald Discovery aims to make natural history clear, careful and worth returning to. We explain the basis and limits of our statements, distinguish general descriptions from specific observations, and welcome corrections when wording or meaning falls short.

Accuracy and uncertainty

We review claims for clarity and consistency before publication, use sources appropriate to the subject, and avoid presenting a possibility as a certainty. Where a subject varies by species, life stage, habitat or conditions, we say so. We do not claim first-hand fieldwork unless a story explicitly describes it, and we do not invent observations, sources or expertise.

Independence and partnerships

Editorial choices are made for reader interest and subject relevance, not to promise favourable coverage. Paid placements and sponsored material are clearly labelled as such and kept distinct from editorial articles. A partner cannot buy an editorial conclusion, and we will decline arrangements that would make the distinction unclear.

Corrections

If a reader spots an error, they can use the Contact page to identify the story and explain the concern. We review reports, correct material when warranted and make significant changes clear in the story. A correction should improve the reader's understanding rather than quietly disguise a meaningful change.

Images and illustrations

Images support the subject but are not proof of a claim. Some illustrations may be generated with AI; when that is the case, we label them appropriately and do not present them as documentary photographs of a real observation.